|
 |
|
  |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Livestock predation by big cats in North State of Goiás
Data on cattle
predation by pumas (Puma concolor) and jaguars (Panthera onca) has
been recorded for six years in a farm in Northern Goiás, Mid-Western Brazil. This
research’s main objectives were to determine: (1) the actual
proportion of cattle killed by big cats; (2) whether there was a
certain age class targeted by those predators; (3) whether the
predation fluctuated along the year and (4) the spatial distribution
of cattle predation. Data were recorded by employees and cattle
managers using forms with the following information (observer’s
name, date, id numbers, cause of mortality, age and sex). Predation
represented 21,7% (n=309) of the overall cattle mortality. In
biomass, kills represented 0,4 % of the farm’ annual stock with 63,8
kg/km². Predation was strongly correlated with cattle’s age with
most attacks occurring on calves younger than 2 months old then
gradually decreasing the animals get older. Predation was mainly
associated with cattle’s age class and location along with the time
of the births it occurred. It clearly appeared that cattle predation
varied spatially and temporally. We recommended several preventive
techniques to be used in order to limit cattle predation in rural
farming contexts so as to reduce the conflict between villagers and
large felids and thus enhance the last big cats’
conservation.
Calf killed by a
cougar (Puma concolor) and dragged to a forest fragment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palmeira, F.B.L.;
Crawshaw Jr., P.G.; Haddad, C.M.; Ferraz, K.M.P.M.B. & Verdade, L.M.
2006. Fatores sazonais e espaciais na predação de bovinos por
onças. Resumo do VII Congresso Internacional Sobre Manejo
de Fauna Silvestre na Amazônia e América Latina, Ilhéus, Bahia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palmeira, F.B.L.; Crawshaw Jr., P.G.; Haddad, C.M.; Ferraz, K.M.P.M.B. & Verdade, L.M. 2008. Cattle depredation by puma (Puma concolor) and jaguar (Panthera onca) in central-western Brazil. Biological Conservation, 141: 118-125. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|