|
 |
|
  |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hunting in rural settlement in the South of Amazon Forest
In this study, I
investigated the effects on the local populations of wild mammals of
the hunting activities of the residents of a rural settlement in the
Amazonian forest of the northern part of the Brazilian state of Mato
Grosso. The second part of the Japuranã settlement – the study site
– was occupied three years ago. Formal interviews were conducted
with 17 settlers. Additional information was collected informally,
during all forms of contact with settlers during the study period.
The majority of settlers are from southern and
southeastern Brazil. Typically, they
are semi-literate rural workers, with very low monthly income. The
principal hunting techniques used are “ambush”, “chase with dogs”
and “excursion”. Game meat was an important part of settlers’ diets,
and was included in about a third of meals. The activities of 14
hunters were monitored between May and November, 2003, during which
they captured 113 mammals belonging to 17 species. Analyses of
population structure based on crania were possible for only two
species, the white-lipped (Tayassu
pecari) and the collared
(Pecari
tajacu) peccaries. The
analysis indicated that the situation of the structure of the
population of the T.pecari and the P.tajacu is sensible and could
seriously be affected if the pressure increase. An estimated
4096.3
kg of game was extracted from an area of
approximately 38 km², representing an average consumption of
0.268
kg of meat per person per day. Line transect
population surveys were conducted at three sites, two in the
settlement and a third in a nearby “control” area of continuous
forest where hunting is not practised. Over a total transect of
108
km, 15 species of mammal and four species of
bird were recorded, with relatively high sightings rates in
comparison with most other sites in central and eastern Amazonia. However, species richness and
abundance were greater at both settlement sites in comparison with
the control. The abundance of ungulates (peccaries and deer), the
primary game species, was also greater in the settlement (both
sites) in comparison with the control. This suggests clearly that
hunting pressure has not yet had a significant impact on the mammal
populations of the settlement, at least in terms of abundance. The
majority (85.8%) of hunting was directed at subsistence, while 8.0%
involved the control of predators of domestic stock, and the
remaining 6.2% was “predatory”, basically for the protection of the
dogs during chase hunting. Despite this pressure, the relative
abundance of mammals in the settlement suggests that hunting is
sustainable over the short term (three years), possibly as a result
of the natural abundance of mammals in the region, and the still
reduced human population density. However, this situation may not
last long, given that deforestation and consequent habitat
fragmentation is an ongoing process, and there are no controls on
hunting in the area. The results of this study provide an important
data base for the development of management plans for the local
fauna, involving the local community, government, environmental
organisations, and research institutions. These plans will be
fundamental to both the conservation of species and the more
efficient exploitation of game resources by local
settlers.
Hunter baiting
peccaries (Pecari tajacu and Tayassu pecari) with salt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trinca, C.T. 2004. Caça em assentamento rural no sul da Amazônia. Dissertação de
Mestrado. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Universidade Federal do Pará. 53p.
Trinca,
C.T. & Ferrari, S.F. 2006. Caça em assentamento rural na Amazônia Matogrossense. In: Jacobi, P. & Ferreira, L.C. (org.). Diálogos em
ambiente e sociedade no Brasil. ANPPAS, Annablume, Indaiatuba, SP. pp. 155-167.
Trinca, C.T.
& Ferrari, S.F.
2006. Pressão de caça sobre mamíferos silvestres em
assentamento rural no sul da Amazônia. Resumo do VII Congresso Internacional Sobre Manejo de Fauna
Silvestre na Amazônia e América Latina, Ilhéus, Bahia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|